Epson V500 Error Diffusion

What he Obama said Yoani Sanchez: "dialogue" without freedom for Cuba

(Posted on this blog on November 19, 2009.)
What did U.S. President Barack Hussein Obama in his responses to the blogger Yoani Sanchez? Someone translate for me, even from English to English, please. (See here, from the penultimate day.) A diplomatic language that expresses nothing, and at the same time, Paradoxically, it speaks volumes: "dialogue" without freedom for political prisoners. Certainly, questions of Sanchez also left him another chance, because not say much (no conviction in them the rules, so do not expect that Hussein Obama would do it for himself), unless when, on the contrary, U.S. summons using the term "blockade" instead of "embargo"
"6. You are a man committed to the development of new communication and information technologies. But Cubans still with many limitations for Internet access . How much responsibility is in that the U.S. blockade on Cuba and how the Cuban government? "
To recognize, however, "good manners" and "courtesy" of Obama not challenged on Sanchez, the term "blockade."
Question number 2 is where only allowed to question the legitimacy of the government of Raul Castro:
"2. In the event there, by his government, a willingness to end the dispute," this would happen to recognize the legitimacy of the government of Raul Castro as the only valid interlocutor in a casual conversation? "
On the other side, what is the "dispute" in the U.S. with the Castro regime?
Question number 3 in the best case, sins of naive
"3. Has renounced U.S. government to use military force as a way to end the dispute?"
At least, Obama replied yes there clearly that there is no intention to do so. And how if we did not know.
None of the questions referred Yoani Sánchez political prisoners or dissidents. The confined to non-existence. We know we can not ask the impossible, but, why not Obama mentions? "Courtesy impeccable with your interlocutor? Neither
Sánchez questions or responses of the U.S. president denounced the absence of basic freedoms and human rights in Cuba, and oppression totalitarian regime, reducing it to a simple matter of "nuances" and situations "circumstantial", and "new technologies" (well, the Internet will solve all the existential and material of the Cubans), and the need for "dialogue" between U.S. and Cuba.
In any case, this pas de deux between the blogger and Obama shows that one is the ideal partner of the other in the Cuban issue.
Neither said anything, and neither has any political project.
But, good news!: Habemus leader! It Sánchez, tailored for Obama: in both, words that do fall into the void, and with that aim, therefore, fraud of nowhere and falsehood.