(Posted on this blog on March 29, 2010.)
Current Note: There is an" enemy rumor "that he has written a letter of condolence to Cristina Kirchner, the recent widow and president of Argentina.
thought, yet, that the letter of the blogger Yoani Sanchez, Brazilian President Lula, it would refer to intercede for political prisoners to be released, and until I could point out its complicity with the Castro regime, even more apparent tacit acquiescence in what was a virtual murder, the Orlando Zapata Tamayo.
Honestly, I thought. After all, I said, blogger wrapped in the flag of Zapata Tamayo just before he died. And Lula, at the time, was in Cuba. Had not yet buried Zapata, Lula continued almost canoodling with Fidel and Raul Castro. A blogger had to have hurt the shocking complicity of the Brazilian president.
When I read the letter, was that it's just that Lula intercede for her with the dictatorship, to grant him permission to leave as long as Brazil to attend the presentation of a documentary about him.
I have nothing against you will take care of itself. After all, I also said if Hussein Obama quickly answered the letter (which uses the term "blockade" as stipulated in the scheme, rather than the correct "embargo"), the blogger suspected that he could rely on the good offices of Lula to be let out.
I (n) ism aside, it is this confidence in Lula which is hard to swallow.
"Lula did not know the blogger who has praised the regime? "He did not know that before traveling to Havana this time, 50 dissidents asked for a hearing and to intercede for political prisoners? Lula refused to do so, as we all know.
"did not know that upon returning to Brazil continued defending the satrapy Castro, saying he had to respect the decisions of the Cuban legal system? "He did not know who said:" Imagine if all the criminals in Sao Paulo go on hunger strike to demand their freedom? Well matched to Orlando Zapata Tamayo, a prisoner of conscience, with the murderers, thieves and drug dealers. As he was a hunger striker, went further and said that "today" do not do it again because it is "harmful to the body."
"You have given recent signs of having great confidence in the good faith of the Cuban government. I might do the illusion of those who run my country wants to keep alive in you that trust and, in order not to disappoint-entering your application that give me permission to visit Brazil. You would only be in my name asking for any Brazilian, and for any human being is an inalienable right. "
Is it then that" great confidence in the good faith of the Cuban government "being complicit in the death of Zapata Tamayo and imprisonment of dissent, and that such a government it does is uphold the laws of Cuba, as expressed Lula?
Lula order not to disappoint, the scheme must consent to the blogger trip to Brazil.
Thus, the "good faith "the scheme would prove a white card requested by Lula for her, because the regime could not reject the mediation of someone who, like Brazil, relies on the virtues and benevolence of the Cuban government as he himself said in his words in defense of totalitarian dictatorship.
Suppose that yes, the infamous blogger was unaware of Lula. This does not mean that in the case of ignorance, would be reducing all to itself, and nothing else: If you can travel to Brazil, Lula is "good" and mutatis mutandis, what would the regime, which I can not deny anything Brazilian.
Perhaps, if the name is the thing that said Jorge Luis Borges, the blogger contains it: "I" and "coordination", which as far as I can remember, colloquial Arabic means "me."
That said, I have nothing against "self", but there are circumstances, such as being particularly living as unfortunate and tragic - and in which the blogger has participated since its undeniable activism, "where we must adhere to decency, sensitivity and, indeed, common sense: how Lula might be able to intercede for Yoani Sanchez with the alignment that has demonstrated with the regime?
But who knows ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment